By Grace M. Ledbetter
Combining literary and philosophical research, this research defends an completely leading edge interpreting of the early historical past of poetics. it's the first to argue that there's a distinctively Socratic view of poetry and the 1st to attach the Socratic view of poetry with past literary tradition.
Literary thought is mostly acknowledged to start with Plato's recognized critique of poetry within the Republic. Grace Ledbetter demanding situations this entrenched assumption through arguing that Plato's prior dialogues Ion, Protagoras, and Apology introduce a distinctively Socratic thought of poetry that responds polemically to conventional poets as rival theorists. Ledbetter tracks the assets of this Socratic reaction through introducing separate readings of the poetics implicit within the poetry of Homer, Hesiod, and Pindar. interpreting those poets' theories from a brand new perspective that uncovers their literary, rhetorical, and political goals, she demonstrates their decisive impact on Socratic brooding about poetry.
The Socratic poetics Ledbetter elucidates focuses now not on censorship, yet at the interpretation of poetry as a resource of ethical knowledge. This philosophical method of reading poetry stands at odds with the poets' personal theories--and with the Sophists' therapy of poetry. not like the Republic's concentrate on exposing and banishing poetry's irrational and inevitably corrupting impression, Socrates' concept comprises poetry as material for philosophical inquiry inside an tested life.
Reaching again into what has too lengthy been thought of literary theory's prehistory, Ledbetter advances arguments that would redefine how classicists, philosophers, and literary theorists take into consideration Plato's poetics.
Read Online or Download Poetics before Plato: Interpretation and Authority in Early Greek Theories of Poetry PDF
Best Literary Criticism books
Instead of providing a standard chronology of Russian literature, Russian Literature: a really brief creation explores where and value in Russian tradition of every kind of literature. How and while did a Russian nationwide literature come into being? What formed its construction? How have the Russians appeared their literary language?
The word "the which means of lifestyles" for lots of turns out a old fashioned suggestion healthy for satirical mauling through Monty Python or Douglas Adams. yet during this lively Very brief creation, famed critic Terry Eagleton takes a significant if frequently fun examine the query and provides his personal remarkable solution. Eagleton first examines how centuries of thinkers and writers--from Marx and Schopenhauer to Shakespeare, Sartre, and Beckett--have replied to the last word query of which means.
This shorter anthology keeps the features of the unique in that it truly is prepared in line with style instead of chronology and translates "literature" very widely to incorporate not only literary fiction, poetry, and drama, yet people and well known literature, lyrics and arias, elegies and rhapsodies, biographies, autobiographies and memoirs, letters, feedback and conception, and travelogues and jokes.
The determine of Sakuntala appears to be like in lots of varieties all through South Asian literature, so much famously within the Mahabharata and in Kalidisa's fourth-century Sanskrit play, Sakuntala and the hoop of Recollection. In those texts, Sakuntala undergoes a serious transformation, relinquishing her assertiveness and autonomy to turn into the quintessentially submissive lady, revealing a lot in regards to the functionality of Hindu femininity that may come to dominate South Asian tradition.
Additional info for Poetics before Plato: Interpretation and Authority in Early Greek Theories of Poetry
H. 1977. Plato’s ethical thought. Oxford. Jaeger, W. 1947. Paideia. Vol. 1, Trans. G. Highet. Oxford. BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES 121 Janaway, C. 1995. photos of Excellence: Plato’s Critique of the humanities. Oxford. Kahn, C. H. 1979. The paintings and regarded Heraclitus: An version of the Fragments with Translation and remark. Cambridge. ———. 1996. Plato and the Socratic Dialogues: The Philosophical Use of a Literary shape. Cambridge. Kirby, J. “Rhetoric and Poetics in Hesiod. ” Ramus 21: 34–60. Kirkwood, G. 1982. choices From Pindar. Chico. Köhnken, A. 1976a. “Die Narbe des Odysseus: Ein Beitrag zur homerisch-epischen Erzähltechnik. ” Antike und Abendland 22: 101–14. ———. 1976b. Die Funktion des Mythos bei Pindar. Berlin. Koller, H. 1956. “Das kitharodische Prooimion. ” Philologus a hundred: 159–206. ———. 1965. “QESPIS AOIDOS. ” Glotta forty three: 277–85. Kraus, W. 1955. “Die Auffassung des Dichterberufs im früen Griechentum. ” WS sixty eight: 65–87. Kraut, R. , ed. 1992. The Cambridge spouse to Plato. Cambridge. Lamarque, P. 1990. “The dying of the writer: An Analytical post-mortem. ” British magazine of Aesthetics 30: 319–31. Lamb, W. R. M. 1924. Plato: Protagoras. long island. Lanata, G. 1963. Poetica preplatonica. Florence. Latte, ok. 1946. “Hesiods Dichterweihe. ” Antike und Abendland 2: 152–63. Lattimore, R. , trans. 1951. The Iliad of Homer. Chicago. ———, trans. 1967. The Odyssey of Homer. big apple. Lefkowitz, M. L. 1991. First-Person Fictions: Pindar’s Poetic “I. ” Oxford. Lewis, C. S. 1961. A Preface to Paradise misplaced. ny. Lombardo, S. and ok. Bell, trans. 1992. Protagoras/Plato. Indianapolis. lengthy, A. A. 2000. “A serious detect of Julia Annas, Platonic Ethics previous and New. ” Oxford reports in old Philosophy 19: 339– 357. Luther, W. 1935. Wahrheit und Lüge. Leipzig. Lynn-George, M. 1988. Epos: note, Narrative and the Iliad. London. Mackie, P. 1997. “Song and Storytelling: An Odyssean point of view. ” TAPA 127: 77–95. Macleod, C. 1983. “Homer on Poetry and the Poetry of Homer. ” In his gathered Essays. manhattan. Maehler, H. 1963. Die Auffassung des Dichterberufs im frühen Griechentum bis zur Zeit Pindars. Göttingen. Marg, W. 1956. “Das erste Lied des Demodokos. ” In his Navicula Chiloniensis. Leiden. ———. 1971. Homer über die Dichtung. Münster. Martin, R. 1992. “Hesiod’s Metanastic Poetics. ” Ramus 21: 11–33. Misch, G. 1973. A historical past of Autobiography in Antiquity. Vol. 1. Reprint, Westport. so much, G. W. 1999. “The Poetics of Early Greek Philosophy. ” within the Cambridge significant other to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. A. A. lengthy. Cambridge. Murdoch, I. 1977. the fireplace and the sunlight: Why Plato Banished the Artists. Oxford. Murnaghan, S. 1987. cover and popularity within the Odyssey. Princeton. Murray, P. 1981. “Poetic proposal in Early Greece. ” JHS one hundred and one: 87–100. ———. 1983. “Homer and the Bard. ” In facets of the Epic, ed. T. Winnifrith, P. Murray, and ok. Gransden. London. 122 BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES ———, ed. 1996. Plato on Poetry. Cambridge. Nagy, G. 1989. “Early Greek perspectives of Poets and Poetry. ” within the Cambridge background of Literary feedback. Vol. I: Classical feedback. Cambridge. Nehamas, A. 1999a. “Plato on Imitation and Poetry in Republic X. ” In Nehamas 1999c.